Since taking the job as analyst for the Future Forecasting Group I have learned many things; three of the most important being that I am always in for a surprise, there is always more to the story than meets the eye, and no matter what might be wrong with the tasking, the viewers will always come back with something noteworthy. This was never more evident than when I was asked to do some supplemental analysis on a target that was tasked and debriefed back in March of 2022. The target ID was. K9L3-H6A8-2541 and the tasking was related to the idea of a global cyber attack. Unfortunately the majority of the data that came back, did not appear to relate to the subject of the target.
It is worth noting that throughout the course of this ongoing experiment in remote viewing, the structure and the methodology of how targets have been tasked and targeted has changed a lot. We have come a long way, especially recently, but, unfortunately, this was not one of the better examples of a well tasked target. Upon first look, I detected several issues that might explain why the viewers did not gather data related to a global cyber attack. First and foremost was the yes-or-no aspect of the primary tasking. The viewers were asked “will there be a global cyber attack?” Getting a clear yes or no in that kind of scenario is unlikely to happen. The rest of the tasking also didn't do the viewers any favors. It made an assumption that a global cyber attack would take place and asked the viewers to look at the most affected countries. Due to the nature of the tasking, it did not give an alternative option for a “no” answer. Also, by the very nature of assuming that the cyber attack would be global and then asking for a specific area, it essentially says that the attack is everywhere but then asks where it is. This sends a very complicated and conflicted intention out to the viewer that can really wreak havoc on acquiring target contact and that's assuming that there is even a target to contact. In essence, this tasking created a big vacuum, and luckily for us, the viewers were able to fill that vacuum with some very interesting and luminous data that pointed to a global future event. Just not the one they were asked to see.
I would wager that the reason that the viewers did not pick up on a global cyber attack, is that for the foreseeable future, there won't be one. I, for one, find that to be a refreshing thought. It doesn’t mean that there won't be cyber attacks, it would just appear that there will, hopefully, not be anything widespread and destructive enough to qualify as a global event. As a matter of fact, Edward did some very interesting work on this target related to a cyber attack in New York that affected the Suffolk county clerk's office. In his session, Edward picked up on a possible situation that appeared to be related to civil administrative activities and a technological regression due to some type of cyber attack.
His data matched up quite well to a long term hacking and ransomware situation that forced government workers to return to pen and paper and took months to resolve. Edward’s session was the only one to address the issue of cyber attack. The rest of the viewers were picking up on some other event that would need some time to make sense of.
When I first began looking at the sessions, I must admit that I was a bit flummoxed. Nothing in them seemed to make sense in relation to the target. After staring at them for a few days I finally had to decide to scrap the idea of relating them to the target and to simply look at them and let the data speak for itself and tell me what the heck they were looking at. One of the first things that came through to me was the overwhelming catholicity of some of the data. This was especially evident in Daz’s session. As a former Catholic, I was struck by the ritualistic and magical elements that are inherent in the mass and these concepts were sprinkled throughout the sessions. Daz hit this topic hard in his work and really identified some very curious information related to the nature of the rituals and the people involved.
Architecture was also something that really stood out to me. Large structures, cathedrals, churches, and the idea of refuge for large numbers of people also began to emerge. At first I questioned if there would be some large, potentially destructive event that would drive people toward seeking refuge in houses of worship. The more I looked at the sessions I started to get the sense that this was some type of funeral. This was especially evident from Nyiam’s work.
I am a bit embarrassed that it took me a minute to realize that I was looking at the funeral of a Pope. I had left the church before Pope Benedict passed away and I honestly didn't pay much attention to it at the time. So while looking at these sessions, I questioned if the viewers were looking at the funeral of Pope Francis or maybe some high profile catholic figure. I finally figured out that the images the viewers had captured were from the funeral mass for Pope Benedict. The images that Nyiam captured really sold this for me. He honed in on the way that Pope Benedict looked as he was laid out in state and especially the way his hands looked clutching his rosary.
Dick’s session really captured the scale and magnitude of the crowds and his repeated use of the word mass in various contexts throughout his session really began to drive the point home. The viewers also picked up on various geographic and architectural features that tied the target to Rome. By looking at these sessions, it was evident that the viewers had identified almost all of the key features related to the funeral mass for Pope Benedict.
One of the things that I always find interesting is the way that each of the viewers zero in on a particular theme or area of the target. Looking at the sessions is a bit like assembling a jigsaw puzzle. Stitching little bits and pieces together until the picture starts to become clear. One of the biggest factors that determines if that picture comes together is the issue of timing. When the viewers collected this data, the event was around 10 months in their future. When I began to look at this data, the event was 8 months in the past. When they debriefed this, almost none of the data made sense in relation to the target and because the event was in their future; it could not be identified at the time. This appears to have led the viewers to believe that their work had fallen flat, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. We needed the benefit of time to be able to see what they had collected. We also needed the benefit of a poorly tasked target! The fact that the tasking was fraught with so many holes, opened things up for our guys to look out to the future and find a big shiny global event that impacted the whole world. Catholicism is a universal faith practiced everywhere. Pope Benedict’s retirement and the installation of Pope Francis was a bit of a strange blip in the history of the church. Many questioned the legitimacy of Pope Francis’s papacy and considered Benedict to be the true pope. This funeral mass would have attracted attention from all quarters. It makes sense that the vacuum of this tasking made space for the viewers to look ahead. I have a feeling that there is probably even more data tucked into these sessions. I would like to take another peek at them again sometime in the future. You never know what might make sense with the passage of a little more time.
To see over 5 years worth of remote viewing sessions, you can join us at www.futureforecastinggroup.com. You can join us, risk free, by signing up to our 7 day free trial and check out our community and content.
If you would like to see my full debrief on this target, check out my interview with Dennis Nappi II on his podcast found on our futureforecastinggroup.com site. Episode #6 , From Cyber Security to Prophesy: The Pope Benedict Revelation.
Thanks for reading Future Forecasters! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
