Before the Diaries and Fifth Amendment: Fauci's 2021 Remote Viewing Session Resurfaces

A remote viewer is handed a code. No name, no context, no hint of the subject. In September 2021, four viewers sat down independently with exactly that: a coded target, run double-blind, with no information about who or what they were looking at.

The tasking asked them to describe the person's intentions, what they had been involved in, whether those intentions were good, and a pointed question about whether they had actually received a real dose of the vaccine they were publicly associated with. What came back was heavy enough that the team held some of it back at the time rather than publish it in full.

The person in question: Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Public figures tied to major health policy decisions attract intense scrutiny in every direction, and that scrutiny is rarely neutral. That's precisely the kind of situation remote viewing is suited to approach differently: not by chasing headlines, but by describing what a structured, blind perception process picks up when pointed at a subject before the public narrative has fully formed.

Years later, that same figure sat before a Senate committee and declined to answer questions about his record, his funding decisions, and his own health, invoking the Fifth Amendment more than a hundred times. Some of what surfaced in that hearing, including new detail about a 2021 medical event, is drawing renewed attention to the original session.

This session was recorded on September 7, 2021.

The full session can also be found on YouTube:

Verification Notes

Video: full original session embedded for members.

Session Date: September 7, 2021
Target Code: P7N7-M9E2
Target (revealed post-session): Dr. Anthony Fauci
Tasking/Sub-cues: Observe the target and describe his intentions. What has he been involved in? Are his intentions good? Did he receive a real dose of the mRNA vaccine?
Viewers: Dick Allgire, Daz Smith, Nyiam Vendryes, Edward Riordan

Original 2021 Findings

The session's initial summary flagged covert funding, intelligence agency surveillance, and serious underlying health complications as core threads. Multiple viewers independently landed on a lavish lifestyle and a strong profit motive sitting alongside the target's public health role.

Nyiam Vendryes described a lavish personal lifestyle paired with a focus on financial gain, and picked up on significant health complications including septic shock, heart attack activity, and blood clot issues.

Daz Smith placed the target inside a government-linked technical and R&D environment, with data pointing toward manipulation, money laundering, and covert operational activity running underneath the public-facing role.

Dick Allgire's sketches from the session depicted the target alongside a medical center setting and notes referencing health complications, including material he associated with vaccine side effects.

Edward Riordan's session notes, read in detail during the debrief, centered on themes of influential financial backing, a split between a public story and a private reality, and a hidden health situation being managed away from public view.

What's Prompted the Second Look

On July 29, 2026, Fauci appeared under subpoena before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and invoked his Fifth Amendment right more than 100 times, declining to answer questions about NIAID funding decisions, the origins of COVID-19, and his own conduct, according to the New York Times and USA Today. During the hearing, Senator Ron Johnson referenced private diary pages, obtained by Senator Rand Paul and later shared with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing a pulmonary infarction Fauci experienced in 2021, and suggested it may have been tied to his COVID vaccination and booster shots, a claim reported by The Atlantic. Fauci did not respond to the claim, again invoking the Fifth.

The team is flagging the timing and the specific 2021 health event as a point of comparison against the original session's data on health complications and vaccine-related material, not as confirmation of a diagnosis, a cause, or any claim made at the hearing itself. The Atlantic's own reporting notes that the vaccine-injury figures cited at the hearing came from unverified, self-reported data and are considered by researchers likely to overstate real totals substantially.

A Note on Interpretation

The original session predates both the 2021 health event now under public discussion and the 2026 hearing by years. Remote viewing data of this kind is symbolic and impressionistic by nature, and cross-referencing it against later news or testimony is a matter of pattern comparison, not verified fact-matching. The team continues to hold that view here.

Disclaimer: Remote viewing sessions represent perceptual data gathered under controlled blind conditions. Session findings are not verified intelligence, medical diagnosis, or factual reporting. Any apparent correlation with later news reporting is offered for comparison purposes only and should not be treated as confirmation. All assessments are interpretive and should be evaluated alongside independent research and judgment.