Remote Viewing Uniswap: Three Viewers, One Blind Target, and a Data Trail to 2027

Remote Viewing Uniswap: Three Viewers, One Blind Target, and a Data Trail to 2027

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn

In late October 2020, decentralized finance was still an experiment measured in weeks, and Uniswap had just become the first DeFi protocol to pass two billion dollars in total value locked. That was the moment three of the team's viewers sat down to work it, blind to the target, with no tickers, no brief, and no context beyond a tasking number.

What came back was a structural read: closed liquidity loops that sustain themselves without loss, a governance token built to hand the protocol to its community, and bridging architecture the viewers could only describe in metaphor because the vocabulary for it barely existed. Dick Allgire sketched elements of the branding and identified key personnel before reveal. Edward Riordan tracked the mechanism through 2027. Daz Smith mapped its volatility pattern and flagged where the peaks would matter.

The value of this record is that it was timestamped while every outcome was still unknown. Readers can weigh the data against what actually happened and judge the method on its own merits.

This session was recorded on October 27, 2020.

Session Notes

Context

  • Target: Uniswap, a decentralized protocol for automated liquidity provision on Ethereum, with the UNI governance token launched weeks before the session. Tasking number 9431.
  • Present: Dick Allgire, Edward Riordan, and Daz Smith, who joined late from the UK. Hosted by Dennis Nappi II. Background research by the team's researcher.
  • Market backdrop at recording: Uniswap was the first DeFi protocol to pass $2 billion in total value locked. Sixty percent of the UNI genesis supply was allocated to community members, with 15% of total supply already distributed to past users and liquidity mining live. The first UNI governance vote had just failed despite 98% support, and the KuCoin hacker had recently used Uniswap to dump ERC-20 tokens. During the session, Bitcoin was quoted at $13,608.88.
  • Backing: an $11 million Series A led by Andreessen Horowitz, with SV Angel among eight investors.
  • People surfaced in the background research: founder Hayden Adams (former Siemens engineer, Stony Brook 2016), growth lead Ashleigh Schap (formerly MakerDAO), Moody Salem (cited prior work at Google and Amazon/AWS), Khalil Capuzio (former Microsoft UX), and Aseem Sood (startup advisor, New York).

Findings vs. interpretation: Dick Allgire

  • Pre-reveal sketches carried the horn element of the branding, framed through the War Collier effect: base gestalts arrive as fragments and assemble later.
  • Described and sketched a blonde high achiever, matched after reveal to Ashleigh Schap. Also pulled the Maker affiliation, consistent with her MakerDAO history.
  • Founder sketch carried a thin face and square glasses, labeled "founder," consistent with Hayden Adams.
  • Price-structure read: a run-up that stays high, then turns volatile. Strong positive feel on the token.
  • Flagged a core-team health event, illness or death with hospitalization imagery, framed as sad but survivable for the project, with the Steve Jobs and Apple comparison. Unverified; retain as session data only.
  • Larger-backing read: European and Swiss banking connections, Geneva, a confident middle-aged figure absent from public team materials, and a new form of money backed by Swiss banks involving quantum technology.
  • Data-language cluster: transmission without transmission, rapid forks, hyperbolic data, nodes jumping locations, plus gene splicing, genome sequencing, and life-extension themes.

Findings vs. interpretation: Edward Riordan

  • Structural core: closed-loop token networks joined by a bridging protocol. Funds move in and out within the system without loss. "Sustainability" in his data read as cash renewability: money recirculating inside a closed system. Green and carbon-credit language kept surfacing alongside it.
  • Ledger read: proofs as verified statements, system integrity framed as tamper-resistant, everything held inside the pressure cooker.
  • Adjacencies: humanitarian commitments and child welfare appearing inside the financial elements, private-industry and healthcare data, and participation data packaged and traded between corporations. His phrase: your data package is worth more than you.
  • Timeline walk: still building into end-2021; a spike feel around end-2022; 2023 as a difficult year with issues needing resolution; end-2024 a clearing, with corporate-to-individual digital utilization rising across IDs, healthcare, and credentials; 2025 to 2026 cooperation among major forces; 2026 to 2027 consolidation under larger corporate ownership, with current coding treated as obsolete by 2027.
  • Hardware thread for 2024: a thin key-coded card, thumbprint as a minor safety feature, dead card if lost and reassigned with a new key code. Proper identification read as the real priority; safety read as the sales pitch.
  • Deep-tech thread: the project building five to seven moves ahead of visible outcomes, with medical and biotech integration, nanobots, organ-function data, radiation monitoring, and space-tourism support.
  • Network-design thread: token-ring architecture, a bus pass required to access closed rings, bridge keys connecting loops, and the conclusion that the current internet cannot host this scope while a blockchain-based network can.

Findings vs. interpretation: Daz Smith

  • Overall feel: spiky, erratic, busy, with strong enthusiasm in the energetic field. Swings up and down, and solid underneath.
  • Repeated spiky ideograms read as rise-and-drop; one carried the horn element again. Logo attempt produced angular dissecting shapes, bold and colorful.
  • Primary-person read: dark-haired male in his 30s to 40s, an entrepreneur juggling multiple ventures, a heavy traveler, media savvy. The host noted possible correspondence with Moody Salem. Daz flagged his own confidence as low on this element.
  • Tech read: tumbling motion, games and domino associations, coins falling with slot machine and vending machine impressions, and merged boxes or containers connected, echoing Edward's closed loops and bridge.
  • Holder sentiment into late December: better and improving after a previously traumatic, noisy stretch.
  • Pattern read: constant up-and-down movement, with opportunity concentrated in timing around peaks. His note: an adjoining junction may be a signal to a coming rise. Self-scored 6 out of 10.

Probabilistic read

  • All three viewers gave the target a thumbs up.
  • Convergent elements: upward bias with heavy volatility across all three; closed-loop architecture from Edward and Daz; branding elements from Dick and Daz; strong backing behind the project from Dick and Edward.
  • Single-viewer elements to treat with care: the health-event flag, the Swiss-banking thread, and the long-range consolidation and biotech timeline.
  • In-session posture: opportunity concentrated in timing around peaks rather than straight-line holding.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for education and entertainment. Remote viewing is an experimental discipline, and session data is probabilistic, never a guarantee of outcomes. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset, including UNI. Do your own research and consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

Comments

Sign in or join the 1% who know more than the 99% to read and leave comments.