The Great Reset: A 2020 Remote Viewing Session, a Rally Shooting, and the Plan Still Unfolding

In mid-2020, before the phrase became a headline, a remote viewing team worked a target called the Great Reset. One viewer described a leader on a raised platform, a televised speech, and a lone young shooter, a man he said had been pushed into the act, with at least one other male behind him.

Four years later, a twenty-year-old shot at Donald Trump on live television in Butler, Pennsylvania. The FBI has since declared the investigation inactive, concluding the shooter acted alone, without establishing a motive. A former counterterrorism director claims related inquiries were shut down early. And in 2026, staged-event claims spread from the internet's edges to some of the biggest names in media, on both sides of politics.

Six years on, we scored the 2020 Great Reset session against the public record: the platform event, the satellite grid, digital identity, gold, and the question the official file never answered. What the data suggests about whether the reset is still unfolding may be the most consequential part.

This session was recorded on October 7, 2020.

Verification Notes

The Target

• Tasking, as read in-session: the objective of the Great Reset, the timeframe of its peak, how it is being implemented, the parties involved, and a move to the future to look back at its defining events.
• Viewers: Daz Smith, Edward Riordan, Dick Allgire, Hitomi. Hosted by Dennis Nappi II, with Ed (tasking) framing.
• Tasking included COVID-19 imagery, which anchored several viewers' contact.

Where the Public Conversation Went

• The WEF launched the initiative on June 3, 2020, fronted by Klaus Schwab and then-Prince Charles. The term went viral in November 2020 and hardened into permanent oppositional shorthand, absorbing CBDCs, 15-minute cities, ESG, and vaccine policy.
• The institution behind the term turned over: Schwab resigned as chair in April 2025 amid a whistleblower probe and was cleared of material wrongdoing that August; Larry Fink and André Hoffmann stepped in as interim co-chairs; president Børge Brende resigned in February 2026.
• The phrase now lives almost entirely as social-media shorthand. The live fights happen under different names: digital ID, age verification, AI surveillance, tokenized finance.

Daz Smith: The Platform Event

• Session data: male leader on a raised platform giving a televised speech, loud bang from up and behind, a lone male shooter aged roughly 20 to 30, clouded or drugged mind, "pushed into doing this," social media involved in the indoctrination, crowd fleeing, civil unrest in the background, closing AOL of "civil war."
• Strongest correspondence: July 13, 2024, Butler, Pennsylvania. Leader on stage, live on television, shots from an elevated position off to the side, a lone 20-year-old gunman, and an immediate surge of "civil war" rhetoric online.
• Honest caveats: Daz's felt timing was 2020 to 2021, roughly three and a half years early. The shooter's complexion and possible cap do not match Thomas Matthew Crooks.
• The FBI declared the investigation inactive in November 2025 under Kash Patel, concluding Crooks acted alone while establishing no motive. The official file closed with the central question unanswered, which keeps Daz's "pushed" element open rather than resolved. See the Managed-Event Question below.

Edward Riordan: The Term and the Frame

• Per Ed in-session, Edward produced "Great Reset" and "Great Rebuild" as key terms in an earlier session, before the team had encountered them anywhere. The WEF material was found afterward. "Build Back Better" then became the actual political slogan of the rebuild phase.
• His structural frame aged best of all: a mastermind layer running a game while a flashier event consumes attention, with the explicit call that "the big shiny object is what'll be remembered" while the deeper program gets forgotten. That is close to a literal description of five years of discourse: the public fought over the slogan while digital identity, tokenized finance, and AI governance advanced under other names.
• His "human 2.0 / new harvest" metaphor tracks the transhumanism conversation moving from fringe to mainstream, including the first Neuralink human implant in January 2024.
• The frame does double duty now: it is also the cleanest lens for the Butler question. See below.

Dick Allgire: The Grid and the Checkpoints

• "Dome of energy in the sky... worldwide Wi-Fi... Skynet... who controls this controls the word." The satellite internet layer is now real infrastructure, with Starlink alone at several thousand satellites and direct-to-cell service. "Who controls the word" became the defining speech battle of the decade: the Musk Twitter acquisition in 2022, EU Digital Services Act enforcement, the UK Online Safety Act, and the AI camera-network fights still in the news in late 2026.
• Checkpoints and denied movement matched both the immediate term (lockdowns, vaccine passports) and the structural term (record global displacement above 120 million, biometric entry systems expanding in Europe).
• "Everything from now on will cause massive protests" held as a description of the decade, from the convoys to the farmers to sustained global protest tempo.
• Long-dated and unresolved: the "20 years hence" retrospective judgment of our era, and the Sagittarius timing cue.

Hitomi: Lab, Gold, and the Digital Database

• The laboratory cluster (blood samples, biosuited technician, multilingual conversation, coronavirus, AOL of the Wuhan lab) hit the tasking document directly. The lab-origin hypothesis has since become the assessed lean of the FBI, the Department of Energy, and as of January 2025 the CIA, all at low to moderate confidence.
• "Microsoft coin" has a specific real-world anchor: Microsoft patent WO2020060606, a cryptocurrency system using body activity data, published March 2020. No coin ever launched; score it as eerie literal resonance.
• "Associated with gold, gold mines" aged well. Gold is trading above $4,100 an ounce as of October 2026 after a historic run and record central-bank accumulation.
• "World digitalization database of all people" maps onto the digital ID fights of 2025 and 2026, most sharply the UK's BritCard: announced mandatory in September 2025, a petition near 3 million signatures, the mandatory element dropped in January 2026, and the scheme scrapped under Burnham.
• Her "top-level international agreement" among world leaders has a real artifact: the WHO Pandemic Agreement adopted May 2025.
• COVID timeline was mixed: "decrease this December" missed, "keeps going until about 2022" was fair, and the 2023 endpoint coincides with the WHO ending the global health emergency in May 2023.
• The ET negotiating table, psychic children, and hybrid material remain in the unverifiable layer. Worth noting only that "non-human intelligence" language has since entered congressional records through the UAP hearings.

Ed and Dennis: The Framing Calls

• "We're in it right now" and "cryptocurrencies will be involved in all of this" held: spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, a US strategic bitcoin reserve in 2025, US stablecoin legislation, a US ban on CBDC development, and a tokenization push led, with some irony, by the same BlackRock whose CEO now co-chairs the WEF.
• Dennis's walk through the WEF partner list and the "digital traceability, digital trust" language read at the time as a program inventory, and still does.

The Managed-Event Question

The claim landscape as of October 2026:

• Staged-event claims went fully mainstream in 2026, from both directions. On the right: Tim Dillon ("Just admit you staged it in Butler," April 2026), Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Candace Owens. On the left: creator Leigh McGowan and novelist Joyce Carol Oates. The April 25, 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner attack, for which the alleged attacker was indicted on a charge of attempting to assassinate the president, poured fuel on it.
• The centerpiece of the staged reading is the raised-fist photograph itself: too iconic, too fast, photographers allegedly ushered into position. The photographers' own accounts and smart-glasses footage from a Washington Post photographer on scene contradict the ushering claim, and the flag overhead never moved.
• The evidence problem for the hoax reading: the event unfolded in front of thousands of witnesses and professional cameras, Corey Comperatore was killed, two attendees were seriously wounded, and Crooks was shot dead at the scene. A filmmaker who stages gunfights for a living walked CNN through the logistics and called a live faked assassination astronomically difficult.
• Two claims get blurred in the discourse. "Staged" means a hoax with simulated gunfire. "Managed" means a real shooter and real bullets, allowed or encouraged to proceed. The evidence problems apply to the first. The open questions live in the second.

What the session data maps to:

• Daz's profile is a handled-asset profile: clouded or drugged mind, "pushed into doing this," at least one other male directing, social media as the indoctrination channel. That language fits the managed variant rather than the hoax variant.
• Threads keeping the element live: the FBI declared the case inactive in November 2025 with no motive established; former NCTC director Joe Kent claimed in March 2026, without providing evidence, that at least one related investigation was shut down before completion; Carlson has accused the FBI of lying about Crooks' online footprint; Trump's Butler medical records were never released; six Secret Service agents drew short-term suspensions over the security failure.
• Score: handler element OPEN and unverified. The official record concluded lone actor while leaving motive blank.

How it factors into the reset frame:

• This is where Edward's two-level model earns its keep. The shiny object absorbs all attention while the program advances. Whatever Butler's origin, its measurable functions are on the record: a surge in civil-war rhetoric (Daz's closing AOL), an expanded protective and surveillance posture, a political realignment that put the anti-reset movement's figurehead inside Davos, and a staged-event narrative both political tribes now use to discredit the other.
• The strongest version of the conspiratorial reading does not require the shooting to be fake. It requires the event to be used. If a program like the reset operates through managed perception, polarizing events are its fuel whether they arrive organic, exploited, or directed. That is the hypothesis the 2020 data raises. It is unproven, and we label it that way.
• The 2026 twist worth flagging: the staged narrative itself now functions as a perception-management instrument, which is Dick's "who controls the word" point arriving on schedule.

Monitor next:

• Any document release covering Crooks' digital footprint, communications, or foreign contacts.
• Whether the Kent stand-down claim produces a document or a witness.
• The WHCD case: indictment filings, the alleged manifesto's contents, and any connective rhetoric to Butler.
• Whether staged-event rhetoric escalates into the midterms, and who funds its amplification.

The Counterfactual: If the Shot Had Landed

One question came up while working through the possibilities: Trump could have died that day. How would the ripple effects have played into the reset? Working the counterfactual exposes the property of the reset frame that matters most.

The timeline where the shot lands:

• Butler was July 13, 2024. The Republican convention opened July 15. A nominee killed on live television 48 hours before his own convention leaves no succession mechanism for a candidate. The RNC would have faced a live floor fight, and eight days later Biden exited the race anyway. Both major parties functionally leaderless inside two weeks, four months before an election, in a country already fluent in civil-war rhetoric. Daz's closing AOL stops being rhetoric in that world: retaliatory violence, militia mobilization, attacks on officials and media figures.
• Markets gap down hard, and gold does what Hitomi's session described, only faster and with a body attached.
• The mechanism that matters: within days, the attack gets attributed to online radicalization, because the shooter was a 20-year-old with a digital footprint and no legible motive. That attribution is the on-ramp for the exact infrastructure the session described: domestic-terrorism legislation, identity-verified internet access, expanded platform monitoring, federalized event security.
• Post-crisis America builds surveillance capacity reflexively. 9/11 produced DHS and the Patriot Act. A murdered candidate in 2024 would have given the digital identity and speech-control layer its bipartisan moment, with a funeral as the sponsor. Dick's "who controls the word" point arrives with flags at half mast.

The timeline we actually got:

• Survival produced the chosen-one consolidation and the mandate. Then the irony: the anti-reset administration delivered the digital-money layer anyway. Stablecoin legislation, the strategic bitcoin reserve, spot ETFs already live, and BlackRock's CEO co-chairing the WEF while leading the tokenization push.
• In the survival timeline, the reset's monetary infrastructure advanced under a populist banner rather than a Davos one.

The synthesis:

• Put the two timelines side by side and the pattern is the point. Death timeline: crisis, emergency powers, identity layer, speech controls. Survival timeline: consolidation, mandate, tokenized finance, grid build-out. Different packaging, same infrastructure compounding underneath.
• That is Edward's two-level frame operating exactly as he described it in 2020: the shiny object absorbs the attention, and which shiny object barely matters, because the program runs on the level below events.
• This is also the strongest form of the "allowed to happen" thesis, and the one requiring the least coordination. A program indifferent to outcomes does not need to script the event. It only needs to be positioned so that any outcome is usable. Optionality at the level of history: if you can monetize both the martyr and the mandate, you never had to choose between them, and you never had to make a phone call.

What Has Not Manifested

• Hitomi's dated 2026 earth-changes map (axis tilt, Canada flooded, New Zealand joined to Australia) has not manifested as of October 2026, and the year is nearly closed. Score it unfulfilled on its own stated clock.
• Dick's Sagittarius timing cue was never resolved.
• Daz's event timing ran roughly three and a half years early.
• No handler or direction evidence has surfaced for Crooks. Daz's "pushed" element stays open, carried by the absence of a motive rather than by any positive evidence.

What to Monitor Next

• The session's infrastructure data is the part still compounding: digital identity rollouts and retreats, CBDC development outside the US, age-verification and speech-control legislation, satellite grid consolidation, and gold repricing against sovereign debt stress.
• Edward's two-level frame is the analytical lens to keep: watch what the loud argument of the month is covering.
• Butler file: Crooks digital-footprint releases, the Kent claim, the WHCD case. If evidence of direction or handling ever emerges, Daz's "pushed into doing this" element moves from open to live.

Disclaimer: Remote viewing is an experimental intelligence practice, and session data is probabilistic rather than certain. The correspondences and open questions in this lookback are drawn from the public record as of October 2026 and reflect analysis, including clearly labeled hypothesis and scenario analysis, rather than proof of foreknowledge or of any claim about the Butler investigation. Nothing here is financial, legal, or medical advice. Always do your own research before making decisions.